FEDERA
JUDGE WON'T DISMISS STAGLIANO OBSCENITY CASE
WASHINGTON —
A federal judge
again has refused to dismiss obscenity charges against John
Stagliano and his two production companies, Evil Angel
Productions Inc. and John Stagliano Inc.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, in a memorandum
opinion Friday, rejected their claim that federal obscenity laws
are unconstitutional, saying that obscene material is not
protected by the 1st Amendment.
"Having considered the defendants' overbreath of
arguments, I am not convinced that such strong medicine is
warranted in this case," Leon said. "Nor am I convinced that the
federal obscenity statutes are unconstitutionally vague as
applied to Internet speech.
"Finally, I reject the defendants' most sweeping
claim — that the entire indictment is void because recent
developments in Supreme Court case law guarantees the right to
produce and distribute obscenity."
Stagliano and his companies were indicted on
seven counts for illegal possession, distribution and sale of
the obscene materials, but they claim that federal laws
criminalizing the interstate trafficking of obscenity are
unconstitutional.
FBI agents used the defendants' website to order
two films, "Milk Nymphos" and "Storm Squirters 2 'Target
Practice.'" An FBI agent in Washington also downloaded a free
trailer called "Fetish Fanatic Chapter 5."
But, in an important notation, Leon said said he
is certain that the online material will be judged "as a whole"
and not individually according to obscenity laws, eliminating
Stagliano's concerns that the trailer would be taken out of
context.
With the ruling, federal prosecutors will have to
show that the trailer is obscene in the context of the web page,
Leon said.
But Leon rejected Stagliano's claim of a right to
sexual privacy, saying such a right does not cover the
distribution of obscene materials.
He said the
producers' case "pales in comparison" and "does not even
remotely approach" the sexual privacy cases concerning
homosexual rights and rights to obtain birth control.