Pink
Visuals Adult Industry Anti-Piracy Movements Gaining Steam
Source: Press Release
LOS ANGELES –
Amidst the speed
networking, award show buzz, deal-making and assorted other
revelry that took place earlier this month at the adult
entertainment industry trade event known as the XBIZ L.A.
Conference, a group of adult studios gathered to discuss perhaps
the single greatest threat to the future viability of the adult
entertainment business: digital content piracy.
For the second time in five months, adult studio
Pink Visual coordinated the Content Protection Retreat, an event
that provides attendees with intensive educational workshops
covering a broad selection of piracy-related topics, including
commonly-held misconceptions about the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act, the copyright registration process, site-operator
litigation, end-user litigation and the subtle legal and
technical differences between the various content distribution
platforms and mediums favored by pirates.
CPR2 also gave attendees the opportunity to learn
more about the Anti-Piracy Action Program (APAP) initiative,
which is coordinated by adult industry trade association the
Free Speech Coalition. Attendees received an in-depth demo of
the digital fingerprint filtering technology employed by APAP to
detect and prevent infringement at the moment of content upload.
Content removal services were also
well-represented at CPR2, as attendees were afforded the chance
to discuss the services offered by the technology-based
take-down service Degban, the digital rights management and
watermarking service vendor BuyDRM, manual site review and
take-down service provider Take Down Piracy, European end-user
monitoring and litigation firm Media-Protector, and the
aforementioned PornGuardian.
“All of these services have evolved beyond what
might come to mind when someone says ‘digital fingerprinting’ or
‘DRM’ or ‘take-down service,’” said Allison Vivas, President of
Pink Visual. “Meeting directly with these companies and
litigators really helps studios to craft a comprehensive
anti-piracy strategy, because in order to know what’s right for
your particular company, you have to reach an understanding of
what your options are, and how those options can be combined to
better protect your and more effectively enforce your
copyrights.”
As litigating against content pirates represents
one of the primary means for rights-holders to enforce their
intellectual property rights, it is no surprise that both the
first CPR and CPR2 included presentations by legal experts and
attorneys with extensive knowledge of intellectual property law
and experience in handling copyright lawsuits. Participating at
CPR2 were attorneys from Jenner & Block LLP, a firm with years
of experience representing mainstream entertainment
rights-holders; One, LLP, an intellectual property ‘boutique’
firm based in Los Angeles that has handled cases for both
rights-holders and defendants accused of violating copyrights;
attorney Gill Sperlein of the Law Offices of D. Gill Sperlein,
who also runs the FSC APAP program and has represented Titan
Media and other adult studios in copyright litigation; and UCLA
law professor Douglas Lichtman, who also serves as an
anti-piracy strategist for a number of Fortune 100 companies.
Vivas said that more important than the quality
of information that has been made available to CPR participants
is the fact that studios who have taken part in the events are
“actually following through on the action plan they’ve made as a
result of attending.”
“It’s all well and good to go to a seminar and
learn, but if you don’t put that knowledge to work for you, then
the education won’t really help you that much,” Vivas said.
“Fortunately, we’ve seen that the CPR is producing results, both
in the form of participating studios taking action, and in the
word reaching site operators that the time has come to clean up
their act, and to be more proactive in doing their part to
reduce piracy. At the same time, we’re seeing a lot of action
being taken by studios and companies that have not participated
in the CPR directly, but who share in the goal of mitigating the
impact of content piracy.”
While much of the adult industry’s effort to
combat piracy takes place outside of the public view, Vivas said
that proof that the industry’s effort can be found in some key
metrics that are available publicly. Specifically, Vivas cited
the increase in site-operator lawsuits, 5 additional tube sites
committing to finger print filtering, and take-down service
providers indicating greater than a 100% increase in the number
of DMCA notices sent, all within the past 5 months. The FSC APAP
program reports that it now has over 40,000 video fingerprints
in its database, and has found 43,000 content matches to date on
tube sites, representing 1.5 billion views of the content.
Vivas said that while she’s encouraged by these
signs of progress, the adult industry has “a long, long way to
go where fighting piracy is concerned.”
“As an industry, we’re way behind the curve in
terms of our anti-piracy efforts compared to the mainstream
entertainment sector,” Vivas said. “The good news is that we’ve
built a lot of momentum on the issue, and if we can maintain
that momentum, and keep the pressure on the pirates, I believe
we can eventually push piracy back down to a level where it is
an annoyance and a nuisance, but no longer an existential threat
for our industry.”
The Content
Protection Retreat is an adult industry movement designed to
unite producers of adult content in a collaborative anti-piracy
effort. The CPR brings together experts in law, technology and
public relations to present studios with a full range of options
for combating content piracy and violations of their copyrights.
For More information about the Content Protection Retreat, it’s
vendors or attendees visit: http://www.contentprotectionretreat.com.
For information about Pink Visual visit www.pinkvisual.com,
call: 1.866.360.PINK or email:
Kim@PinkVisual.com